Misuse of correlation and regression in three medical journals

1999 Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 63 citations

Abstract

Errors relating to the use of the correlation coefficient and bivariate linear regression are often to be found in medical publications. This paper reports a literature search to define the problems. All the papers and letters published in the British Medical Journal, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine during 1997 were screened for examples. Fifteen categories of errors were identified of which eight were important or common. These included: failure to define clearly the relevant sample number; the display of potentially misleading scatterplots; attachment of unwarranted importance to significance levels; and the omission of confidence intervals for correlation coefficients and around regression lines.

Keywords

Bivariate analysisCorrelationLinear regressionRegressionConfidence intervalStatisticsRegression analysisMedical journalSample (material)MedicineComputer scienceFamily medicineMathematics

MeSH Terms

Data InterpretationStatisticalHumansLinear ModelsPeriodicals as TopicResearchStatisticsNonparametric

Related Publications

Introduction to Econometrics

Foreword. Preface to the Second Edition. Preface to the Third Edition. Obituary. INTRODUCTION AND THE LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL. What is Econometrics? Statistical Background and M...

2020 WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks 3511 citations

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
review
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
123-128
Citations
63
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

63
OpenAlex
2
Influential
47
CrossRef

Cite This

Alan Porter (1999). Misuse of correlation and regression in three medical journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine , 92 (3) , 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689909200306

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/014107689909200306
PMID
10396255
PMCID
PMC1297101

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%