Abstract

Pettengill tests whether there is an excessive number of firms in a monopolistically competitive equilibrium by a device of considerable expository merit. He removes one firm, and redistributes the resources thus released equally over the remaining firms in the sector, to see if welfare can be improved. To do this correctly, we write n, for the equilibrium number of firms and xe for the output of each. With fixed cost a and constant average variable cost c, removing one firm releases (a + Cxe) of resources, and this enables the output of each of the remaining ( I) firms to be increased (a + c Xe )/(1fl 1)}. The quantity xo of the numeraire good is unaffected by this, and the utility function (equation (31) of our paper) is

Keywords

NuméraireMonopolistic competitionEconomicsFree entryMicroeconomicsFixed costCompetitive equilibriumVariable costVariable (mathematics)Competition (biology)WelfareConstant (computer programming)Function (biology)Product (mathematics)EconometricsMonopolyMathematicsEcologyComputer scienceMarket economyBiology

Related Publications

The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme

It is often argued that competition in the product market reduces managerial slack. We formalize this idea. Suppose that there is a common component to firms' costs, i.e., as on...

1983 The Bell Journal of Economics 1505 citations

Publication Info

Year
1975
Type
article
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
302-304
Citations
7571
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

7571
OpenAlex

Cite This

Avinash Dixit, Joseph E. Stiglitz (1975). MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OPTIMUM PRODUCT DIVERSITY. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) , 67 (3) , 302-304. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.268957

Identifiers

DOI
10.22004/ag.econ.268957