Abstract
Two algorithms for producing multiple imputations for missing data are evaluated with simulated data. Software using a propensity score classifier with the approximate Bayesian bootstrap produces badly biased estimates of regression coefficients when data on predictor variables are missing at random or missing completely at random. On the other hand, a regression-based method employing the data augmentation algorithm produces estimates with little or no bias.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Applied Missing Data Analysis
Part 1. An Introduction to Missing Data. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Chapter Overview. 1.3 Missing Data Patterns. 1.4 A Conceptual Overview of Missing Data heory. 1.5 A More Formal De...
A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models
This article describes and evaluates a procedure for imputing missing values for a relatively complex data structure when the data are missing at random. The imputations are obt...
Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching
We show that propensity score matching (PSM), an enormously popular method of preprocessing data for causal inference, often accomplishes the opposite of its intended goal—thus ...
Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach
Multiple imputation (MI) is now well established as a flexible, general, method for the analysis of data sets with missing values. Most implementations assume the missing data a...
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values
Following the seminal publications of Rubin about thirty years ago, statisticians have become increasingly aware of the inadequacy of “complete-case” analysis of datasets with m...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-309
- Citations
- 786
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/0049124100028003003