‘Muslim Brothers, Black Lads, Traditional Asians’: British Muslim Young Men’s Constructions of Race, Religion and Masculinity

2001 Feminism & Psychology 149 citations

Abstract

Despite the growth of academic interest in masculinity, issues around black masculinity remain largely undertheorized. British Muslim men are noticeably absent in the literature, despite their increasing representation in public discourses as fundamentalist, ‘ultimate Others’ (Phoenix, 1997). This article uses a critical feminist approach to explore young Muslim men’s construction of racialized, gendered identities. Discussion groups were conducted with 24 young British Muslims, aged 14-15 years. Half of the groups were conducted by the white, British, female author, and the other half by a British-Pakistani female researcher. Particular attention is given to the young men’s use of discourses of hegemonic masculinity in their negotiations between ‘Muslim’, ‘black’ and ‘Asian’ masculinities. Issues are also raised with regard to the role of the researcher(s) and the interaction of ‘race’ and gender between interviewers and participants in the production of research.

Keywords

MasculinityGender studiesHegemonic masculinityWhite (mutation)SociologyRace (biology)NegotiationEthnic groupHegemonyWhite BritishIntersectionalityPoliticsPolitical scienceSocial scienceAnthropologyLaw

Related Publications

Changes in Wage Rates Between 1959 and 1967

DESPITE the importance of wage rates in our understanding of economic activity, there are almost no wage data available appropriate for studying changes in the wages received by...

1971 The Review of Economics and Statistics 14 citations

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
79-105
Citations
149
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

149
OpenAlex

Cite This

Louise Archer (2001). ‘Muslim Brothers, Black Lads, Traditional Asians’: British Muslim Young Men’s Constructions of Race, Religion and Masculinity. Feminism & Psychology , 11 (1) , 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353501011001005

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0959353501011001005