Abstract
Weaknesses in several recently proposed ideas about congestion control and avoidance in high-speed netwroks are identified. Both sides of the debate concerning prior reservation of resources versus walk-in service, open-loop control versus feedback control, rate control versus window control, and router-based control versus source-based control are presented. The circumstances under which backpressure is useful or not are discussed, and it is argued that a single congestion scheme is not sufficient, but that a combination of several schemes is required for complete congestion management in a network.
Keywords
Related Publications
A hop by hop rate-based congestion control scheme
The flow/congestion control scheme of TCP is based on the sliding window mechanism. As we demonstrate in this paper, the performance of this and other similar end-to-end flow co...
Congestion control in computer networks: issues and trends
Popular myths that cheaper memory, high-speed links and high-speed processors will solve the problem of congestion in computer networks are shown to be false. A simple definitio...
A delay-based approach for congestion avoidance in interconnected heterogeneous computer networks
In heterogeneous networks, achieving congestion avoidance is difficult because the congestion feedback from one subnetwork may have no meaning to sources on other subnetworks. W...
Traffic phase effects in packet-switched gateways
Much of the traffic in existing packet networks is highly periodic, either because of periodic sources (e.g., real time speech or video, rate control) or because window flow con...
The click modular router
Clicks is a new software architecture for building flexible and configurable routers. A Click router is assembled from packet processing modules called elements . Individual ele...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Pages
- 55-70
- Citations
- 70
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.cs/9809088