Abstract
The title and introductory paragraph of a recent Rapid Communication are highly misleading. The content is correct. We make further suggestions for the most efficient use of the tetrahedron integration scheme.
Keywords
TetrahedronScheme (mathematics)Computer scienceMathematicsGeometryMathematical analysis
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Image and video upscaling from local self-examples
We propose a new high-quality and efficient single-image upscaling technique that extends existing example-based super-resolution frameworks. In our approach we do not rely on a...
Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition
Suppose a discrete-time signal S(t), 0/spl les/t<N, is a superposition of atoms taken from a combined time-frequency dictionary made of spike sequences 1/sub {t=/spl tau/}/ and ...
Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health
Earth's natural systems represent a growing threat to human health. And yet, global health has mainly improved as these changes have gathered pace. What is the explanation? As a...
A Tool for Reviewers
Peer review lies at the core of science and academic life. In one of its most pervasive forms, peer review for the scientific literature is the main mechanism that research jour...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1984
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5965-5965
- Citations
- 84
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
84
OpenAlex
Cite This
O. Jepsen,
O. K. Andersen
(1984).
No error in the tetrahedron integration scheme.
Physical review. B, Condensed matter
, 29
(10)
, 5965-5965.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.29.5965
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1103/physrevb.29.5965