Abstract
ABSTRACT Aim Nowadays, large amounts of species distribution data and software for implementing different species distribution modelling methods are freely available through the internet. As a result, methodological works that analyse the relative performance of modelling techniques, as well as those that study which species characteristics affect their performance, are necessary. We discuss three important topics that must be kept in mind when modelling species distributions, namely (i) the distinction between potential and realized distribution, (ii) the effect of the relative occurrence area of the species on the results of the evaluation of model performance, and (iii) the general inaccuracy of the predictions of the realized distribution provided by species distribution modelling methods. Location Unspecific. Methods Using some recent papers as a basis, we illustrate the three issues mentioned above and discuss the negative implications of neglecting them. Results Considering a potential‐realized distribution gradient, different modelling methods may be arranged along this gradient according to their ability to model any concept. Complex techniques may be more suitable to model the realized distribution than simple ones, which may be more appropriate to estimate the potential distribution. Comparisons among techniques must consider this scenario. The relative occurrence area of the species conditions the results of the evaluation scores, implying that models of rare species will unavoidably yield higher discrimination values. Moreover, discrimination values that are usually reported in the literature may imply considerable over or underestimations of the distribution of the species. Main conclusions It is extremely important to establish a solid conceptual and methodological framework on which the emergent field of species distribution modelling can stand and develop.
Keywords
Species distributionDistribution (mathematics)EcologyComputer scienceEnvironmental niche modellingEconometricsStatisticsMathematicsBiologyHabitat
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling
Species distribution models (SDM) are commonly used to obtain hypotheses on either the realized or the potential distribution of species. The reliability and meaning of these hy...
Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only data
Summary Presence‐only data, for which there is no information on locations where the species is absent, are common in both animal and plant studies. In many situations, these ma...
Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling
Abstract Species distribution modelling is central to both fundamental and applied research in biogeography. Despite widespread use of models, there are still important conceptu...
Model‐based uncertainty in species range prediction
Abstract Aim Many attempts to predict the potential range of species rely on environmental niche (or ‘bioclimate envelope’) modelling, yet the effects of using different niche‐b...
Measurement of the Realized Qualitative Niche: Environmental Niches of Five Eucalyptus Species
A method is described, using Generalized Linear Modelling, for determining the qualitative environmental realized niche (QERN) of plant species. Five species of Eucalyptus growi...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2008
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 885-890
- Citations
- 636
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
636
OpenAlex
Cite This
Alberto Jiménez‐Valverde,
Jorge M. Lobo,
Joaquín Hortal
(2008).
Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling.
Diversity and Distributions
, 14
(6)
, 885-890.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x