NOTE ON LEARNING, CONTINGENCY, AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE

1966 Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 12 citations

Abstract

Elementary learning is not sensitive to contingencies between presence—absence variates. Even adult subjects, who under optimal conditions are capable of grasping the concept of contingency, normally do not appear to utilize this concept. The available evidence reduces confidence in the realism of clinical judgments, and is consonant with certain widespread fallacies in clinical research.

Keywords

ContingencyPsychologyCognitive psychologyRealismSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1966
Type
article
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
265-266
Citations
12
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

12
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jan Smedslund (1966). NOTE ON LEARNING, CONTINGENCY, AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 7 (1) , 265-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1966.tb01363.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9450.1966.tb01363.x