Abstract

Omapatrilat provided broadly superior antihypertensive efficacy when used in a setting resembling clinical practice. Angioedema was more common than with enalapril but life-threatening angioedema was rare. The risk-benefit profile for omapatrilat in clinical use therefore appears likely to be favorable in appropriate patients.

Keywords

EnalaprilMedicineACE inhibitorRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineDiureticBlood pressureCombination therapyCardiologyAngiotensin-converting enzyme

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
article
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
103-111
Citations
577
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

577
OpenAlex

Cite This

William J. Kostis, Milton Packer, Henry R. Black et al. (2004). Omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with hypertension: the Omapatrilat Cardiovascular Treatment vs. Enalapril (OCTAVE) trial. American Journal of Hypertension , 17 (2) , 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.09.014

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.09.014