Abstract

A new approach to optimizing or hedging a portfolio of financial instruments to reduce risk is presented and tested on applications. It focuses on minimizing conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) rather than minimizing value-at-risk (VaR), but portfolios with low CVaR necessarily have low VaR as well. CVaR, also called mean excess loss, mean shortfall, or tail VaR, is in any case considered to be a more consistent measure of risk than VaR. Central to the new approach is a technique for portfolio optimization which calculates VaR and optimizes CVaR simultaneously. This technique is suitable for use by investment companies, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and any business that evaluates risk. It can be combined with analytical or scenario-based methods to optimize portfolios with large numbers of instruments, in which case the calculations often come down to linear programming or nonsmooth programming. The methodology can also be applied to the optimization of percentiles in contexts outside of finance.

Keywords

CVARExpected shortfallValue at riskRisk measurePortfolioPortfolio optimizationCoherent risk measureLinear programmingEconometricsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceInvestment (military)Measure (data warehouse)Actuarial scienceRisk managementEconomicsMathematicsFinanceData mining

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
21-41
Citations
6160
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

6160
OpenAlex

Cite This

R. T. Rockafellar, Stan Uryasev (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. The Journal of Risk , 2 (3) , 21-41. https://doi.org/10.21314/jor.2000.038

Identifiers

DOI
10.21314/jor.2000.038