Abstract

The study of resilience in development has overturned many negative assumptions and deficit-focused models about children growing up under the threat of disadvantage and adversity. The most surprising conclusion emerging from studies of these children is the ordinariness of resilience. An examination of converging findings from variable-focused and person-focused investigations of these phenomena suggests that resilience is common and that it usually arises from the normative functions of human adaptational systems, with the greatest threats to human development being those that compromise these protective systems. The conclusion that resilience is made of ordinary rather than extraordinary processes offers a more positive outlook on human development and adaptation, as well as direction for policy and practice aimed at enhancing the development of children at risk for problems and psychopathology.

Keywords

NormativePsychologyHuman development (humanity)CompromiseAdaptation (eye)Psychological resilienceDisadvantagePsychopathologyChildhood developmentResilience (materials science)Developmental psychologySocial psychologySociologyPolitical scienceClinical psychologySocial science

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
227-238
Citations
5647
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

5647
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ann S. Masten (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.. American Psychologist , 56 (3) , 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.227

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.227