Abstract

The political nature of work environments has been discussed for quite some time; however surprisingly little is known about the personal and situational factors that influence employees' perceptions of organizational politics. In this study, portions of a model of organizational politics perceptions proposed by Ferris, Russ, and Fandt (1989) were tested in two studies using samples reflecting considerable variability on jobs, age, sex, and education, as well as hierarchical level, across four different organizations. In Study 1, regression analyses, used to empirically examine a proposed model of organizational politics perceptions, demonstrated that feedback, job autonomy, skill variety, and opportunity for promotion contributed significantly to the explanation of variance in perceptions of organizational politics, after controlling for variance due to organization. In Study 2, a new expanded measure of organizational politics perceptions was used to provide a more refined analysis of the antecedents and consequences of politics perceptions. Directions for theoretical and empirical research on organizational politics are discussed in light of the present results.

Keywords

PoliticsPerceptionPromotion (chess)Situational ethicsVariance (accounting)Organizational studiesOrganizational commitmentSocial psychologyMultilevel modelAutonomyPsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceBusinessStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Organizational Commitment

Two models of the factors leading to organizational commitment are compared: the member-based model, which holds that commitment originates in the actions and personal attribute...

1983 Work and Occupations 298 citations

Publication Info

Year
1992
Type
article
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
93-116
Citations
800
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

800
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gerald R. Ferris, K. Michele Kacmar (1992). Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Journal of Management , 18 (1) , 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800107

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/014920639201800107