Abstract
Abstract Information is a source of power in the planning process. This article begins by assessing five perspectives of the planner's use of information: those of the technician, the incremental pragmatist, the liberal advocate, the structuralist, and the “progressive.” Then several types of misinformation (inevitable or unnecessary, ad hoc or systematic) are distinguished in a reformulation of bounded rationality in planning, and practical responses by planning staff are identified. The role and ethics of planners acting as sources of misinformation are considered. In practice planners work in the face of power manifest as the social and political (mis)-man-agement of citizens' knowledge, consent, trust, and attention. Seeking to enable planners to anticipate and counteract sources of misinformation threatening public serving, democratic planning processes, the article clarifies a practical and politically sensitive form of “progressive” planning practice.
Keywords
MisinformationPlannerPower (physics)Face (sociological concept)PoliticsPublic relationsBounded rationalityWork (physics)PragmatismPolitical scienceDemocracySociologyKnowledge managementComputer scienceEpistemologyEngineeringLawSocial scienceArtificial intelligence
Related Publications
Network Power in Collaborative Planning
This article makes a case that collaborative planning is becoming more important because it can result in network power. Collaborative policy processes are increasingly in use a...
Doing Democracy Up-Close: Culture, Power, and Communication in Community Building
This article considers how democracy gets done, and undone, at the micro-level of the planning meeting. I use concepts of social performance to frame issues of culture and power...
Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation
This article explores belief in political rumors surrounding the health care reforms enacted by Congress in 2010. Refuting rumors with statements from unlikely sources can, unde...
Catching Goldfish: Quality in Qualitative Research
This paper reviews the contribution of qualitative methods to health services research (HSR) and discusses some of the issues involved in recognizing quality in such work. The p...
The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy
Abstract Deliberative democracy has been the main game in contemporary political theory for two decades and has grown enormously in size and importance in political science and ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2018
- Type
- book
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-179
- Citations
- 1493
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1493
OpenAlex
3
CrossRef
Cite This
John Forester
(2018).
Planning in the Face of Power.
Journal of the American Planning Association
, 48
(1)
, 165-179.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351179522-14
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.4324/9781351179522-14