Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?
Most papers that employ Differences-in-Differences estimation (DD) use many years of data and focus on serially correlated outcomes but ignore that the resulting standard errors...
Floating absolute risk: An alternative to relative risk in survival and case‐control analysis avoiding an arbitrary reference group
Abstract We discuss the problem of describing multiple group comparisons in survival analysis using the Cox model, and in matched case‐control studies. The standard method of co...
Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models
Mixed-effect models are frequently used to control for the nonindependence of data points, for example, when repeated measures from the same individuals are available. The aim o...
Combining Possibly Related Estimation Problems
Summary We have two sets of parameters we wish to estimate, and wonder whether the James-Stein estimator should be applied separately to the two sets or once to the combined pro...
Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis
Statistical heterogeneity and small-study effects are 2 major issues affecting the validity of meta-analysis. In this article, we introduce the concept of a limit meta-analysis,...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1987
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-434
- Citations
- 1311
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x