Abstract
O 3 February 1999, President Clinton signed an executive order dealing with invasive species in the United States. The order was designed to lay the foundation for a program “to prevent the introduction of invasive species and provide for their control and to minimize the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause” (Clinton 1999). This program includes far-reaching plans to prevent, plan, monitor, and study species’ invasions. Such high-level attention emphasizes the enormity of the problem facing the United States, and in fact the entire world: With ever-growing international commerce, reduced barriers to trade, and increasing human influence, species are moving around, and natural systems are suffering drastic changes. The dimensions of the problem are indeed impressive. Alien plants, animals, and microbes have poured into the United States from all directions. Natural systems have been disrupted, species extinguished, transportation and agriculture compromised, and resources damaged (Carlton 1997–1998, Ogutu-Ohwayo 1997–1998, Richardson 1997–1998, Shiva 1997–1998). In fact, most modern agriculture is based on nonnative organisms; problems arise because questions of when and why some escape and become nuisances remain unanswered. More generally, no proactive approach to combating such species is available—invasive species are dealt with one at a time, as they become problematic. Scientific approaches to a synthetic, and ultimately proactive, understanding of species invasions have developed along several lines, but most have been frustrated by the complex and unpredictable nature of such invasions—which species will invade and which invaders will become serious problems? For example, considerable effort has gone into identifying characteristics of species likely to invade, or of invaders likely to become pests (e.g., Lawton and Brown 1986, Smallwood and Salmon 1992, Carlton 1996). Another line of inquiry and effort has focused on modeling spatial patterns of range expansion after initial invasion (e.g., Mollison 1986, Williamson and Brown 1986, Reeves and Usher 1989, Hastings 1996, Shigesada and Kawasaki 1997, Holway 1998). All in all, though, a general, synthetic, predictive, proactive approach to species invasions is lacking (Mack 1996) but is desperately needed (Hobbs and Mooney 1998).
Keywords
Related Publications
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
ABSTRACT Biological invasions are a global consequence of an increasingly connected world and the rise in human population size. The numbers of invasive alien species – the subs...
Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America
Ecological niche modeling, a new methodology for predicting the geographic course of species' invasions, was tested based on four invasive plant species (garlic mustard, sericea...
Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale
Abstract Predicting the probability of successful establishment of plant species by matching climatic variables has considerable potential for incorporation in early warning sys...
Trends of obesity and underweight in older children and adolescents in the United States, Brazil, China, and Russia
Background: Few studies have used the same references across countries to examine the trends of over- and underweight in older children and adolescents. Objective: Using interna...
Long-term trend toward earlier breeding in an American bird: A response to global warming?
In regions with severe winters, global warming may be expected to cause earlier onset of breeding in most animals, yet no documentation of such a trend exists in North America. ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2001
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 363-363
- Citations
- 722
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0363:psiuen]2.0.co;2