Abstract

O 3 February 1999, President Clinton signed an executive order dealing with invasive species in the United States. The order was designed to lay the foundation for a program “to prevent the introduction of invasive species and provide for their control and to minimize the economic, ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause” (Clinton 1999). This program includes far-reaching plans to prevent, plan, monitor, and study species’ invasions. Such high-level attention emphasizes the enormity of the problem facing the United States, and in fact the entire world: With ever-growing international commerce, reduced barriers to trade, and increasing human influence, species are moving around, and natural systems are suffering drastic changes. The dimensions of the problem are indeed impressive. Alien plants, animals, and microbes have poured into the United States from all directions. Natural systems have been disrupted, species extinguished, transportation and agriculture compromised, and resources damaged (Carlton 1997–1998, Ogutu-Ohwayo 1997–1998, Richardson 1997–1998, Shiva 1997–1998). In fact, most modern agriculture is based on nonnative organisms; problems arise because questions of when and why some escape and become nuisances remain unanswered. More generally, no proactive approach to combating such species is available—invasive species are dealt with one at a time, as they become problematic. Scientific approaches to a synthetic, and ultimately proactive, understanding of species invasions have developed along several lines, but most have been frustrated by the complex and unpredictable nature of such invasions—which species will invade and which invaders will become serious problems? For example, considerable effort has gone into identifying characteristics of species likely to invade, or of invaders likely to become pests (e.g., Lawton and Brown 1986, Smallwood and Salmon 1992, Carlton 1996). Another line of inquiry and effort has focused on modeling spatial patterns of range expansion after initial invasion (e.g., Mollison 1986, Williamson and Brown 1986, Reeves and Usher 1989, Hastings 1996, Shigesada and Kawasaki 1997, Holway 1998). All in all, though, a general, synthetic, predictive, proactive approach to species invasions is lacking (Mack 1996) but is desperately needed (Hobbs and Mooney 1998).

Keywords

Invasive speciesEcologyIntroduced speciesAgricultureOrder (exchange)BiologyBusiness

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
363-363
Citations
722
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

722
OpenAlex

Cite This

A. Townsend Peterson, Dave Vieglais (2001). Predicting Species Invasions Using Ecological Niche Modeling: New Approaches from Bioinformatics Attack a Pressing Problem. BioScience , 51 (5) , 363-363. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0363:psiuen]2.0.co;2

Identifiers

DOI
10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0363:psiuen]2.0.co;2