Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?

1996 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 615 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the relative importance of cyclical fluctuations in labor and capital utilization, increasing returns to scale, and technology shocks as explanations for procyclical productivity. It exploits the intuition that materials inputs do not have variable utilization rates, and materials are likely to be used in fixed proportions with value added. Therefore, materials growth is a good measure of unobserved changes in capital and labor utilization. Using this measure shows that cyclical factor utilization is very important, returns to scale are about constant, and technology shocks are small and have low correlation with either output or hours growth.

Keywords

EconomicsReturns to scaleProductivityIntuitionEconometricsCapital (architecture)Monetary economicsProduction (economics)Macroeconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Capital Theory and Investment Behavior

Tax policy and investment behaviour: tax policy and the cost of capital services, estimates of the parameters of the investment function, the effects of tax policy on investment...

1963 American Economic Review 2141 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
719-751
Citations
615
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

615
OpenAlex

Cite This

Sarbani Basu (1996). Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 111 (3) , 719-751. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946670

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2946670