Abstract

Both the issues inherent in regulation of specific risks and the contexts in which such regulatory processes occur are often characterized by confusion and controversy. Tools based on multiattribute utility measurement (MAUT) can help to clarify public values in risk debates and thus to facilitate option invention and decision making. Stakeholder group representatives, in interaction with an analyst, structure their values relevant to the problem into a value tree. The analyst prepares a common tree, iterating until all stakeholder representatives accept it. Stakeholders express their values as weights on the common tree. This provides a basis for option invention and negotiation. The paper presents three illustrative applications.

Keywords

StakeholderNegotiationConfusionTree (set theory)Risk analysis (engineering)Value (mathematics)Decision treeBusinessManagement scienceActuarial scienceComputer sciencePolitical sciencePublic relationsEngineeringPsychologyLawMathematicsData mining

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
141-158
Citations
88
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

88
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ward Edwards, Detlof von Winterfeldt (1987). Public Values in Risk Debates. Risk Analysis , 7 (2) , 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00979.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00979.x