Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa

1959 Journal of the American Statistical Association 935 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is some evidence that in fields where statistical tests of significance are commonly used, research which yields nonsignificant results is not published. Such research being unknown to other investigators may be repeated independently until eventually by chance a significant result occurs—an "error of the first kind"—and is published. Significant results published in these fields are seldom verified by independent replication. The possibility thus arises that the literature of such a field consists in substantial part of false conclusions resulting from errors of the first kind in statistical tests of significance.

Keywords

Statistical hypothesis testingReplication (statistics)Significance testingStatistical significanceField (mathematics)EconometricsStatistical inferenceStatisticsPsychologyCognitive psychologyMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1959
Type
article
Volume
54
Issue
285
Pages
30-34
Citations
935
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

935
OpenAlex

Cite This

T. D. Sterling (1959). Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 54 (285) , 30-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1959.10501497

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/01621459.1959.10501497