Abstract

Counting codes makes qualitative content analysis a controversial approach to analyzing textual data. Several decades ago, mainstream content analysis rejected qualitative content analysis on the grounds that it was not sufficiently quantitative; today, it is often charged with not being sufficiently qualitative. This article argues that qualitative content analysis is distinctively qualitative in both its approach to coding and its interpretations of counts from codes. Rather than argue over whether to do qualitative content analysis, researchers must make informed decisions about when to use it in analyzing qualitative data.

Keywords

Content analysisQualitative researchQualitative analysisContent (measure theory)Coding (social sciences)MainstreamQualitative propertyComputer sciencePsychologySociologySocial scienceMathematicsPolitical scienceLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Qualitative Data Analysis

First Published in 2004. Learning how to analyze qualitative data by computer can be fun. That is one assumption underpinning this introduction to qualitative analysis, which ta...

2003 2373 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
112-121
Citations
1239
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1239
OpenAlex

Cite This

David L. Morgan (1993). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Guide to Paths not Taken. Qualitative Health Research , 3 (1) , 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/104973239300300107