Abstract
Despite growing recognition of the need for qualitative methods in health services research, there have been few attempts to define quality standards for assessing the results. This article acknowledges the desirability of a plurality of standards. However, it is argued that three interrelated criteria can be identified as the foundation of good qualitative health research: interpretation of subjective meaning, description of social context, and attention to lay knowledge. These criteria can be examined in relation to different dimensions of any research report, including theoretical basis, sampling strategy, scope of data collection, description of data collected, and concern with generalizability or typicality. But if the concern is with the appropriateness of care and with understanding the factors that shape lay and clinical behavior, then these criteria must form the basis of a hierarchy of qualitative research evidence.
Keywords
Generalizability theoryQualitative researchMeaning (existential)Scope (computer science)Context (archaeology)PsychologyManagement scienceData collectionQuality (philosophy)Foundation (evidence)Interpretation (philosophy)Health careApplied psychologySociologyEpistemologyComputer scienceSocial sciencePolitical scienceDevelopmental psychology
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework
Aim. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in research studies. It describes the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and generalization and expl...
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weakn...
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration
The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias ...
The five‐factor personality inventory: cross‐cultural generalizability across 13 countries
In the present study, we investigated the structural invariance of the Five‐Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI) across a variety of cultures. Self‐report data sets from ten Euro...
Qualitative methodologies II: a brief guide to applying interpretative phenomenological analysis in musculoskeletal care
Abstract In this paper, we conclude our two‐part series discussing how readers of Musculoskeletal Care might employ qualitative methods. In the first paper of the series, we foc...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-351
- Citations
- 982
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
982
OpenAlex
Cite This
Jennie Popay,
Anne Rogers,
Gareth Williams
(1998).
Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research.
Qualitative Health Research
, 8
(3)
, 341-351.
https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800305
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/104973239800800305