Abstract
Explains how social scientists can evaluate the reliability and validity of empirical measurements, discussing the three basic types of validity: criterion related, content, and construct. In addition, the paper shows how reliability is assessed by the retest method, alternative-forms procedure, split-halves approach, and internal consistency method.
Keywords
Related Publications
The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of creating a valid and reliable checklist with the following features: appropriate for assessing both randomised and non-randomised studies; ...
Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment
Background. The paper reports on the development of the WHOQOL-BREF, an abbreviated version of the WHOQOL-100 quality of life assessment. Method. The WHOQOL-BREF was derived fro...
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment is an important step before study initiation usage. Therefore, accurately judging study type is the first priority, and the choo...
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
The final development of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a behaviorally based measure of health status, is presented. A large field trial on a random sample of prepaid group ...
Methodological index for non‐randomized studies (<i>MINORS</i>): development and validation of a new instrument
Background: Because of specific methodological difficulties in conducting randomized trials, surgical research remains dependent predominantly on observational or non‐randomized...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2011
- Type
- reference-entry
- Citations
- 5079
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.4135/9781608712434.n1341