Abstract
Remarks on the taking and recording of biometric measurements in bird ringing Ringing operations hold opportunities for introducing error into biometric recording. This situation needs to be addressed by field workers, data processors and archivists. Avoidable error may be systematic and/or random, and adds "noise" to random error from natural variation. Handling techniques and measuring equipment are responsible for introducing systematic errors in fieldwork. This aspect requires an increased level of professionalism among ringers to correct it. Analysis of data can induce further random error, e.g. when generating indices from measurements. Analysts also need to be aware of pitfalls inherent in field data, especially that collected historically.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Quantification of errors in volume measurements of the caudate nucleus using magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract Purpose To quantify the various sources of error in measuring the volume of the caudate nucleus and to understand these errors would lead to the standardization of the ...
Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization
Despite their massive size, successful deep artificial neural networks can exhibit a remarkably small gap between training and test performance. Conventional wisdom attributes s...
The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project
PART ONE: TAKING THE LEAP INTO THE RESEARCH WORLD The challenge of tackling a research project So what is this thing called research and why do it? The need for research knowled...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2004
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-78
- Citations
- 13
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2478/v10050-008-0058-2