Abstract

Evans and Tarazona have raised a disagreement with the results of Teletzke et al. concerning wetting transitions predicted by van der Waals’ integral theory with exponential fluid potential and two different fluid-solid potentials. We reexamined these results and in agreement with Evans and Tarazona we conclude that the wetting transition is first order when a Lennard-Jones 9-3 fluid–solid potential is chosen. The results are supported by the predictions of a simple model, a discontinuous thick film.

Keywords

WettingWetting transitionvan der Waals forceLennard-Jones potentialSolid surfaceThermodynamicsExponential functionChemistryCondensed matter physicsStatistical physicsPhysicsComputational chemistryChemical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMolecular dynamicsMathematical analysisMolecule

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Wetting: statics and dynamics

The wetting of solids by liquids is connected to physical chemistry (wettability), to statistical physics (pinning of the contact line, wetting transitions, etc.), to long-range...

1985 Reviews of Modern Physics 6986 citations

Publication Info

Year
1984
Type
article
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
589-590
Citations
12
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

12
OpenAlex

Cite This

Robert E. Benner, Gary Teletzke, L. E. Scriven et al. (1984). Reply to ‘‘A Comment on the order of the wetting transition at a solid–fluid interface’’. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 80 (1) , 589-590. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.446405

Identifiers

DOI
10.1063/1.446405