Abstract
Positive and negative selective incentives are shown analytically to have different structural implications when used to induce collective action. Positive selective incentives are effective for motivating small numbers of cooperators and generate pressures toward smaller, more "elite" actions, unless the incentives have jointness of supply. Negative selective incentives are effective for motivating unanimous cooperation, but their use is often uneven and cyclical and may generate hostilities which disrupt the cooperation they enforce. Examples of these dynamics are found in many arenas of collective action and social movements.
Keywords
Related Publications
Civic Norms, Social Sanctions, and Voter Turnout
Voter participation is viewed as a collective action problem overcome chiefly by means of “solidary” and “purposive” selective incentives in the contemporary United States rathe...
Executive Motivations, Earnings, and Consequent Equity Performance
In this paper the financial incentives of executives are analyzed, theoretically and econometrically, with particular emphasis on the relationship between executive motivations ...
Scientific Utopia
An academic scientist’s professional success depends on publishing. Publishing norms emphasize novel, positive results. As such, disciplinary incentives encourage design, analys...
From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling
▪ Abstract Sociologists often model social processes as interactions among variables. We review an alternative approach that models social life as interactions among adaptive ag...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1980
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1356-1375
- Citations
- 560
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1086/227168