Abstract

Summary Three-hundred and sixty-seven respondents selected from five widely differing groups in two U.S. communities were administered a questionnaire tapping personal action for or against nuclear power, as well as a variety of attitudinal, cognitive, and sociodemographic variables. Respondents included members of environmental groups, college students, blue-collar workers, business people, and nuclear engineers and other technologists. The results indicated that degree of self-reported action was systematically correlated with the rated "acceptability," risks, benefits, and qualitative characteristics of nuclear power. The results also pointed to other major correlates of personal action, including confidence in various risk-management institutions and organizations. Emphasis is placed upon general methodological issues involved in the study of risk perceptions, acceptability judgments, and actions.

Keywords

PerceptionNuclear powerPsychologyAction (physics)Social psychologyApplied psychologyVariety (cybernetics)Qualitative researchRisk perceptionCognitionSociologySocial sciencePsychiatry

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Dreams, fairy tales, animals, and cars

Sidney J. Levy

Abstract With growing interest in qualitative research beyond its popular use in focus groups, a greater appreciation of the potential of projective techniques is recommended. E...

1985 Psychology and Marketing 151 citations

Publication Info

Year
1982
Type
article
Volume
116
Issue
2
Pages
179-197
Citations
82
Access
Closed

External Links

View on DOI.org

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

82
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gerald T. Gardner, Adrian R. Tiemann, Leroy C. Gould et al. (1982). Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Acceptability Judgments, and Self-Reported Actions toward Nuclear Power. The Journal of Social Psychology , 116 (2) , 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9922770

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/00224545.1982.9922770