Abstract
An intermediate endpoint is a biologic event or marker that is a precursor to a given health outcome. Examples of potential intermediate endpoints include serum cholesterol for coronary heart disease, endogenous steroid hormones for breast cancer, and CD4 count for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. When one is studying a potential intermediate endpoint in the context of an intervention trial, five types of questions may be investigated: 1) Does the intervention affect the intermediate endpoint? 2) Is the intermediate endpoint associated with prognostic or risk factors? 3) Is the intermediate endpoint associated with the main outcome? 4) Is the intervention effect on the main outcome mediated by the intermediate endpoint? 5) Are the prognostic or risk factor effects mediated by the intermediate endpoint? In this paper, the authors show that each of these questions had different sample size requirements, and they illustrate their point with a discussion of an ancillary study of large bowel epithelial proliferation in the National Cancer Institute's Polyp Prevention Trial. The same methods may be used in an observational study, in which case questions 2, 3, and 5 are relevant. However, much larger numbers than those used in the Polyp Prevention Trial example will be required when the main outcome is rare.
Keywords
MeSH Terms
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Selection of endpoints for clinical trials of acute renal failure in critically ill patients
The selection of appropriate outcome measures is essential to the design of clinical trials of the prevention or treatment of acute renal failure in critically ill patients. In ...
International validation of the consensus Immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study
The estimation of risk of recurrence for patients with colon carcinoma must be improved. A robust immune score quantification is needed to introduce immune parameters into cance...
Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteria
Abstract I discuss the idea of using surrogate endpoints in the context of clinical trials to compare two or more treatments or interventions in respect to some ‘true’ endpoint,...
Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?
Phase 3 clinical trials, which evaluate the effect that new interventions have on the clinical outcomes of particular relevance to the patient (such as death, loss of vision, or...
Surrogate Markers in AIDS: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?
Editorials1 April 1992Surrogate Markers in AIDS: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?Stephen W. Lagakos, PhD, Daniel F. Hoth, MDStephen W. Lagakos, PhD, Daniel F. Hoth, MDAuthor, A...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1992
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1148-1159
- Citations
- 249
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116581
- PMID
- 1462974