Scientists rise up against statistical significance

Keywords

DismissalSanderHistoryPolitical scienceLawEngineering

MeSH Terms

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsAtrial FibrillationConfidence IntervalsHumansModelsStatisticalProbabilityResearch DesignStatistics as Topic

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses

Andy P. Siddaway , Alex M. Wood , Larry V. Hedges

Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. They involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpubl...

2018 Annual Review of Psychology 2157 citations

From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~!

Jason Kung

Research synthesis seeks to gather, examine and evaluate systematically research reports that converge toward answering a carefully crafted research question, which states the p...

2010 The Open Dentistry Journal 308 citations

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

Larissa Shamseer , David Moher , Mike Clarke +5 more

Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct,...

2015 BMJ 12371 citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

David Moher

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasinglyimportant in health care. Clinicians readthem to keep up to date with their field (1, 2), and they areoften used as ...

2009 Annals of Internal Medicine 36952 citations

Evaluation of method in systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in LIS

Kalyani Ankem

The objective of the research was to evaluate systematic reviews and meta-analyses appearing in library and information science (LIS) literature. LIS databases were searched to ...

2008 Library and Information Research 28 citations

Publication Info

Year: 2019
Type: article
Volume: 567
Issue: 7748
Pages: 305-307
Citations: 2852
Access: Closed

External Links

Download PDF (Free) View on DOI.org PubMed Semantic Scholar

Social Impact

Altmetric

Scientists rise up against statistical significance

PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2852

OpenAlex

100

Influential

2278

CrossRef

Cite This

APA Style

                            
                                    Valentin Amrhein, 
                                
                                    Sander Greenland, 
                                
                                    Blake McShane
                                
                            (2019). 
                            Scientists rise up against statistical significance. 
                            Nature
                            , 567
                            (7748)
                            , 305-307.
                            https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9

Identifiers

DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9
PMID: 30894741

Data Quality

Data completeness: 72%