Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds

2003 Medicinal Research Reviews 385 citations

Abstract

Abstract The fast identification of quality lead compounds in the pharmaceutical industry through a combination of high throughput synthesis and screening has become more challenging in recent years. Although the number of available compounds for high throughput screening (HTS) has dramatically increased, large‐scale random combinatorial libraries have contributed proportionally less to identify novel leads for drug discovery projects. Therefore, the concept of ‘drug‐likeness’ of compound selections has become a focus in recent years. In parallel, the low success rate of converting lead compounds into drugs often due to unfavorable pharmacokinetic parameters has sparked a renewed interest in understanding more clearly what makes a compound drug‐like. Various approaches have been devised to address the drug‐likeness of molecules employing retrospective analyses of known drug collections as well as attempting to capture ‘chemical wisdom’ in algorithms. For example, simple property counting schemes, machine learning methods, regression models, and clustering methods have been employed to distinguish between drugs and non‐drugs. Here we review computational techniques to address the drug‐likeness of compound selections and offer an outlook for the further development of the field. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev, 23, No. 3, 302‐321, 2003

Keywords

Drug discoveryComputer scienceDrugCluster analysisSelection (genetic algorithm)Identification (biology)High-throughput screeningMachine learningBiochemical engineeringArtificial intelligencePharmacologyMedicineBioinformaticsEngineeringBiology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
review
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
302-321
Citations
385
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

385
OpenAlex

Cite This

Ingo Muegge (2003). Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds. Medicinal Research Reviews , 23 (3) , 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.10041

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/med.10041