Abstract

Computer scientists and practitioners defend their lack of experimentation with a wide range of arguments. Some arguments suggest that experimentation is inappropriate, too difficult, useless, and even harmful. This article discusses several such arguments to illustrate the importance of experimentation for computer science. It considers how the software industry is beginning to value experiments, because results may give a company a three- to five-year lead over the competition.

Keywords

Computer scienceCompetition (biology)Value (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)SoftwareHistory of computingSoftware engineeringData scienceManagement scienceProgramming languageAlgorithmEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Caffe

Caffe provides multimedia scientists and practitioners with a clean and modifiable framework for state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms and a collection of reference models. ...

2014 11119 citations

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
32-40
Citations
489
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

489
OpenAlex

Cite This

Walter F. Tichy (1998). Should computer scientists experiment more?. Computer , 31 (5) , 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.675631

Identifiers

DOI
10.1109/2.675631