Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence

1987 American Journal of Sociology 2,393 citations

Abstract

Two classes of network models are used to reanalyze a sociological classic often cited as evidence of social contagion in the diffusion of technological innovation: Medical Innovation. Debate between the cohesion and structural equivalence models poses the following question for study: Did the physicians resolve the uncertainty of adopting the new drug through conversations with colleagues (cohesion) or through their perception of the action proper for an occupant of their position in the social structure of colleagues (structural equivalence)? The alternative models are defined, compared, and tested. Four conclusions are drawn: (a) Contagion was not the dominant factor driving tetracyclene's diffusion. Where there is evidence of contagion, there is evidence of personal preferences at work.

Keywords

Cohesion (chemistry)Emotional contagionEquivalence (formal languages)Social psychologyPerceptionCollective actionPsychologyDiffusion of innovationsPositive economicsSociologyEconomicsEconometricsPolitical scienceMathematicsSocial sciencePolitics

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
1287-1335
Citations
2393
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2393
OpenAlex
202
Influential
1550
CrossRef

Cite This

Ronald S. Burt (1987). Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology , 92 (6) , 1287-1335. https://doi.org/10.1086/228667

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/228667

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%