Abstract

Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarize research findings across studies. Special statistical methods are usually needed for meta-analysis, both because effect-size indexes are typically highly heteroscedastic and because it is desirable to be able to distinguish between-study variance from within-study sampling-error variance. We outline a number of considerations related to choosing methods for the meta-analysis of ecological data, including the choice of parametric vs. resampling methods, reasons for conducting weighted analyses where possible, and comparisons fixed vs. mixed models in categorical and regression-type analyses.

Keywords

Categorical variableResamplingHeteroscedasticityStatisticsVariance (accounting)EcologyMeta-analysisSampling (signal processing)EconometricsRegression analysisType I and type II errorsComputer scienceMathematicsBiology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife

We discuss the following problem: given a random sample $\\mathbf{X} = (X_1, X_2, \\cdots, X_n)$ from an unknown probability distribution $F$, estimate the sampling distribution...

1979 The Annals of Statistics 16966 citations

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
1142-1149
Citations
1016
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1016
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jessica Gurevitch, Larry V. Hedges (1999). STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES. Ecology , 80 (4) , 1142-1149. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:siiema]2.0.co;2

Identifiers

DOI
10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:siiema]2.0.co;2