Abstract
Significance Support for Donald J. Trump in the 2016 election was widely attributed to citizens who were “left behind” economically. These claims were based on the strong cross-sectional relationship between Trump support and lacking a college education. Using a representative panel from 2012 to 2016, I find that change in financial wellbeing had little impact on candidate preference. Instead, changing preferences were related to changes in the party’s positions on issues related to American global dominance and the rise of a majority–minority America: issues that threaten white Americans’ sense of dominant group status. Results highlight the importance of looking beyond theories emphasizing changes in issue salience to better understand the meaning of election outcomes when public preferences and candidates’ positions are changing.
Keywords
Presidential systemPresidential electionPolitical sciencePublic opinionChinaDemographic economicsPolitical economyDevelopment economicsPsychologySociologyPoliticsEconomicsLaw
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment
We report the results of a randomized field experiment involving approximately 30,000 registered voters in New Haven, Connecticut. Nonpartisan get-out-the-vote messages were con...
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Following the 2016 US presidential election, many have expressed concern about the effects of false stories (“fake news”), circulated largely through social media. We discuss th...
Partisanship and Economic Behavior: Do Partisan Differences in Economic Forecasts Predict Real Economic Behavior?
Survey data regularly show that assessments of current and expected future economic performance are more positive when a respondent's partisanship matches that of the president....
Network Propaganda
Abstract This book examines the shape, composition, and practices of the United States political media landscape. It explores the roots of the current epistemic crisis in politi...
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
In this 1992 book John Zaller develops a comprehensive theory to explain how people acquire political information from elites and the mass media and convert it into political pr...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2018
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- E4330-E4339
- Citations
- 1194
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1194
OpenAlex
Cite This
Diana C. Mutz
(2018).
Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
, 115
(19)
, E4330-E4339.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1718155115