Abstract

This article considers both structural and strategic influences on collective action. Each person in a group wants to participate only if the total number taking part is at least her threshold; people use a network to communicate their thresholds. People are strategically rational in that they are completely rational and also take into account that others are completely rational. The model shows first that network position is much more important in influencing the revolt of people with low thresholds than people with high thresholds. Second, it shows that strong links are better for revolt when thresholds are low, and weak links are better when thresholds are high. Finally, the model generalizes the threshold models of Schelling (1978) and Granovetter (1978) and shows that their findings that revolt is very sensitive to the thresholds of people "early" in the process depends heavily on the assumption that communication is never reciprocal.

Keywords

ReciprocalAction (physics)Position (finance)Collective actionThreshold modelSocial psychologyMicroeconomicsComputer sciencePsychologyEconomicsPolitical scienceEconometricsPoliticsPhysicsLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

HISTORY, NECESSITY, AND RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY

The main body of rational-choice literature aims to deduce the necessary consequences that result from the interaction of rational agents. In contrast, this paper shows how smal...

1997 Rationality and Society 10 citations

Publication Info

Year
1999
Type
article
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
128-156
Citations
379
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

379
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael Suk‐Young Chwe (1999). Structure and Strategy in Collective Action. American Journal of Sociology , 105 (1) , 128-156. https://doi.org/10.1086/210269

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/210269