Abstract

Abstract Geometrical validation around the Cα is described, with a new Cβ measure and updated Ramachandran plot. Deviation of the observed Cβ atom from ideal position provides a single measure encapsulating the major structure‐validation information contained in bond angle distortions. Cβ deviation is sensitive to incompatibilities between sidechain and backbone caused by misfit conformations or inappropriate refinement restraints. A new ϕ,ψ plot using density‐dependent smoothing for 81,234 non‐Gly, non‐Pro, and non‐prePro residues with B < 30 from 500 high‐resolution proteins shows sharp boundaries at critical edges and clear delineation between large empty areas and regions that are allowed but disfavored. One such region is the γ‐turn conformation near +75°,−60°, counted as forbidden by common structure‐validation programs; however, it occurs in well‐ordered parts of good structures, it is overrepresented near functional sites, and strain is partly compensated by the γ‐turn H‐bond. Favored and allowed ϕ,ψ regions are also defined for Pro, pre‐Pro, and Gly (important because Gly ϕ,ψ angles are more permissive but less accurately determined). Details of these accurate empirical distributions are poorly predicted by previous theoretical calculations, including a region left of α‐helix, which rates as favorable in energy yet rarely occurs. A proposed factor explaining this discrepancy is that crowding of the two‐peptide NHs permits donating only a single H‐bond. New calculations by Hu et al. [Proteins 2002 (this issue)] for Ala and Gly dipeptides, using mixed quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics, fit our nonrepetitive data in excellent detail. To run our geometrical evaluations on a user‐uploaded file, see M OL P ROBITY ( http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu ) or R AM P AGE ( http://www‐cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk/rampage ). Proteins 2003;50:437–450. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords

Ramachandran plotMeasure (data warehouse)Plot (graphics)Position (finance)CrystallographyTurn (biochemistry)SmoothingMolecular geometryResolution (logic)GeometryPhysicsChemistryMathematicsProtein structureMoleculeComputer scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceQuantum mechanicsStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine “dipeptides” (Ace‐Ala‐Nme and Ace‐Gly‐Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution

Abstract We compare the conformational distributions of Ace‐Ala‐Nme and Ace‐Gly‐Nme sampled in long simulations with several molecular mechanics (MM) force fields and with a fas...

2003 Proteins Structure Function and Bioin... 263 citations

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
437-450
Citations
4529
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

4529
OpenAlex

Cite This

Simon C. Lovell, Ian Davis, W.B. Arendall et al. (2003). Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics , 50 (3) , 437-450. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10286

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/prot.10286