Abstract

ABSTRACT The validity of self‐report measures of subjective well‐being (SWB) was examined and compared with non‐self‐report measures using a sample of 136 college students studied over the course of a semester. A principal axis factor analysis of self‐ and non‐self‐report SWB measures revealed a single unitary construct underlying the measures. Conventional single‐item and multi‐item self‐report measures correlated highly with alternative measures, with theoretical correlates of SWB, and with a principal axis factor underlying five non‐self‐report measures of well‐being. Comparisons of family versus friend informant reports demonstrated the considerable cross‐situational consistency and temporal stability of SWB. Evidence of the discriminant validity of the measures was provided by low correlations of the various SWB measures with constructs theoretically unrelated to well‐being. It was concluded that conventional self‐report instruments validly measure the SWB construct, and that alternative, non‐serf‐report measures are useful for providing a comprehensive theoretical account of happiness and life satisfaction.

Keywords

PsychologySubjective well-beingHappinessLife satisfactionDiscriminant validityWell-beingSelf-report studyConstruct validityConstruct (python library)Situational ethicsSocial psychologyBivariate analysisDevelopmental psychologyInternal consistencyPsychometricsStatisticsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Most People Are Happy

Myers and Diener (1995) asked “Who is happy?” but examined the question of who is more and who is less happy In fact, most people report a positive level of subjective well-bein...

1996 Psychological Science 1169 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
317-342
Citations
692
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

692
OpenAlex
12
Influential
393
CrossRef

Cite This

Ed Sandvik, Ed Diener, Larry Seidlitz (1993). Subjective Well‐Being: The Convergence and Stability of Self‐Report and Non‐Self‐Report Measures. Journal of Personality , 61 (3) , 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00283.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00283.x

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%