Abstract

Abstract On the basis of experience with calculated survivorships of patients following treatment for cancer, a simple function, in terms of two physically meaningful parameters, has been evolved, which fits such survivorship data very well. These two parameters can be used to compare succinctly the mortality of two groups, different in respect of treatment, type of cancer, or other characteristics. The parameters are c ("cured"), which represents the proportion of the population which is subject only to "normal" death rates, and β, which is the death rate from the cancer, to which the rest of the population [not "cured," (1–c)] is subject. Thus if one treatment is characterized by c 1 = 0.30, β 1 = 0.25, another by c 2 = 0.20, β 2 = 0.15, this could be interpreted as meaning that while the first treatment "cured" a larger proportion of the population than did the second treatment, it did not ameliorate the deaths attributable to cancer in the patients not cured as much as did the second treatment. If l T is the proportion of the total population surviving to time t, then the function is l T = cl 0+ (1 – c)l 0e −-βt where l 0 is the net survivorship corresponding to "normal" deaths, obtained from standard life tables. A graphic method and also a "least squares" method of estimating c and β are presented with an example, and the evaluated parameters are given for several series of treated cancer patients. Expectation of life and other functions of the life table also have been calculated from the evaluated parameters, for the same series.

Keywords

MedicineCancerOncologyMathematicsInternal medicineStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1952
Type
article
Volume
47
Issue
259
Pages
501-515
Citations
811
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

811
OpenAlex

Cite This

Joseph Berkson, Robert P. Gage (1952). Survival Curve for Cancer Patients Following Treatment. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 47 (259) , 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10501187

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/01621459.1952.10501187