Abstract
Expert searchers need to understand the specifics about data structure and functions of bibliographic and specialized databases, as well as the technical and methodological issues of searching. Search methodology must be based on research about retrieval practices, and it is vital that expert searchers keep informed about, advocate for, and, moreover, conduct research in information retrieval. Expert searchers are an important part of the systematic review team, crucial throughout the review process-from the development of the proposal and research question to publication.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews
Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information that compares health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Sys...
Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane?
If systematic reviews are to provide the information that people need when making decisions about health and social care, we need to be confident that the methods used to plan, ...
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
Background Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, the literature searching component of systematic reviews and related...
The Relation between Systematic Reviews and Practice Guidelines
Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to improve the process and outcomes of health care and to optimize resource utilization. By addressing such issues as prevention...
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
Systematic review has developed as a specific methodology for searching for, appraising and synthesizing findings of primary studies, and has rapidly become a cornerstone of the...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2005
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-80
- Citations
- 255
- Access
- Closed