Abstract
Systematic literature reviews including meta-analyses are invaluable scientific activities. The rationale for such reviews is well established. Health care providers, researchers, and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information; they need systematic reviews to efficiently integrate existing information and provide data for rational decision making. Systematic reviews establish whether scientific findings are consistent and can be generalised across populations, settings, and treatment variations, or whether findings vary significantly by particular subsets. Meta-analyses in particular can increase power and precision of estimates of treatment effects and exposure risks. Finally, explicit methods used in systematic reviews limit bias and, hopefully, will improve reliability and accuracy of conclusions.
Keywords
Systematic reviewReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceManagement scienceMeta-analysisSystematic errorScientific literatureData scienceRisk analysis (engineering)MEDLINEMedicinePower (physics)Political sciencePathologyEconomicsBiologyMathematics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tra...
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and tr...
Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis
In the world of clinical trials and meta-analyses there is an important debate between the “lumpers” and the “splitters.” This relates to whether the overall findings of clinica...
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Althou...
'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review
Systematic reviews use a transparent and systematic process to define a research question, search for studies, assess their quality and synthesize findings qualitatively or quan...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1994
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 6954
- Pages
- 597-599
- Citations
- 1631
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1631
OpenAlex
Cite This
Cynthia D. Mulrow
(1994).
Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews.
BMJ
, 309
(6954)
, 597-599.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597