Abstract
When a takeover or merger is being considered, boards of directors are responsible for making decisions that best benefit their shareholders.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance
The author thanks David Larcker for his assistance and support in designing this study, and the following people for their constructive comments on earlier versions of this manu...
Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrent and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures
This paper provides large-sample evidence that poison pill rights issues, control share statutes, and business combination statutes do not deter takeovers and are unlikely to ha...
Agency Theory, Managerial Welfare, and Takeover Bid Resistance
Tender offers provide an ideal setting for the analysis of agency relationships since the best interests of the principal (target firm shareholders) and agent (target firm manag...
Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority Shareholders
Posttakeover moral hazard by the acquirer and freeāriding by the target shareholders lead the former to acquire as few sharcs as necessary to gain control. As moral hazard is mo...
Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers
The interests and incentives of managers and shareholders conflict over such issues as the optimal size of the firm and the payment of cash to shareholders. These conflicts are ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1987
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 157-168
- Citations
- 50
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/41162137