Abstract
We illustrate testing measurement invariance in a second-order factor model using a quality of life dataset (n = 924). Measurement invariance was tested across 2 groups at a set of hierarchically structured levels: (a) configural invariance, (b) first-order factor loadings, (c) second-order factor loadings, (d) intercepts of measured variables, (e) intercepts of first-order factors, (f) disturbances of first-order factors, and (g) residual variances of observed variables. Given that measurement invariance at the factor loading and intercept levels was achieved, the latent factor mean difference on the higher order factor between the groups was also estimated. The analyses were performed on the mean and covariance structures within the framework of the confirmatory factor analysis using the LISREL 8.51 program. Implications of second-order factor models and measurement invariance in psychological research were discussed. Copyright © 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Two Monte Carlo studies were conducted to examine the sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance at 3 commonly tested levels: factor loadings, inte...
A Monte-Carlo Study of Confirmatory Factor Analytic Tests of Measurement Equivalence/Invariance
In recent years, confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) techniques have become the most common method of testing for measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I). However, no study has...
A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research
The establishment of measurement invariance across groups is a logical prerequisite to conducting substantive cross-group comparisons (e.g., tests of group mean differences, inv...
Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues
Practical and theoretical issues are discussed for testing (a) the comparability, or measurement equivalence, of psychological constructs and (b) detecting possible sociocultura...
What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research.
It is a common practice to export instruments developed in one culture to another. Little is known about the consequences of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural r...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2005
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 471-492
- Citations
- 989
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_7