Abstract

Evidence is reviewed which suggests that there may be little or no direct introspective access to higher order cognitive processes. Subjects are sometimes (a) unaware of the existence of a stimulus that importantly influenced a response, (b) unaware of the existence of the response, and (c) unaware that the stimulus has affected the response. It is proposed that when people attempt to report on their cognitive processes, that is, on the processes mediating the effects of a stimulus on a response, they do not do so on the basis of any true introspection. Instead, their reports are based on a priori, implicit causal theories, or judgments about the extent to which a particular stimulus is a plausible cause of a given response. This suggests that though people may not be able to observe directly their cognitive processes, they will sometimes be able to report accurately about them. Accurate reports will occur when influential stimuli are salient and are plausible causes of the responses they produce, and will not occur when stimuli are not salient or are not plausible causes.

Keywords

PsychologyCognitive psychologyNonverbal communicationDevelopmental psychology

Related Publications

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

Hypothesis I: There exists, in the human organism, a drive to evaluate his opinions and his abilities. While opinions and abilities may, at first glance, seem to be quite differ...

1954 Human Relations 19493 citations

Publication Info

Year
1977
Type
article
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
231-259
Citations
11051
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

11051
OpenAlex
224
Influential
6637
CrossRef

Cite This

Richard E. Nisbett, Timothy D. Wilson (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.. Psychological Review , 84 (3) , 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%