Abstract
Results from three different subject samples extend earlier findings that lengthening a scale beyond some point can actually weaken its validity. A near‐optimal algorithm selected the most valid aggregate of items from a common pool. Findings were then cross validated in a second sample. From this procedure emerged fairly short scales with acceptable cross validities, but only if the item pool had been prescreened for content saturation. Under these circumstances, even extremely short scales of two to four items each, which had survived double cross validation, suffered hardly any loss of cross validity. In a third sample they outperformed standard scales eight times as long. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords
PsychologyStatisticsSample (material)Test (biology)Scale (ratio)Cross-validationSocial psychologyEconometricsMathematics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
A primary goal of scale development is to create a valid measure of an underlying construct. We discuss theoretical principles, practical issues, and pragmatic decisions to help...
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
In this update of Clark and Watson (1995), we provide a synopsis of major points of our earlier article and discuss issues in scale construction that have become more salient as...
Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.
We designed a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale for use in acute stroke therapy trials. In a study of 24 stroke patients, interrater reliability for the scale was foun...
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Cross-sectional data from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) were analyzed to test the validity of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scales as measures of physical ...
Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation
This paper reports on the development of an instrument designed to measure the various perceptions that an individual may have of adopting an information technology (IT) innovat...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1997
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 303-315
- Citations
- 191
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
191
OpenAlex
13
Influential
Cite This
Matthias Burisch
(1997).
Test length and validity revisited.
European Journal of Personality
, 11
(4)
, 303-315.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199711)11:4<303::aid-per292>3.0.co;2-#
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199711)11:4<303::aid-per292>3.0.co;2-#