Abstract
This paper tests the rationality of individual price forecasts in a panel of professional forecasters. Here, unlike in most previous studies, rationality is not rejected. The results here differ because (1) using individual forecasts avoids aggregation bias, (2) comparison of forecasts to initial data avoids bias due to data revision, (3) the professional forecasters have economic incentives to state their expectations accurately, and (4) a new covariance matrix estimator consistent when forecast errors are correlated across individuals is used. Copyright 1990 by American Economic Association.
Keywords
Related Publications
Corporate Forecasts of Earnings Per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Test
The disclosure of corporate forecasts of projected annual earnings was a topic of intensive debate within the investment community during the years 1970-75. Questions of accurac...
Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence *
This paper deals with cross section dependence, homogeneity restrictions and small sample bias issues in dynamic panel regressions. To address the bias problem we develop a pane...
Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach
A panel data approach is advocated and implemented for studying growth convergence. The familiar equation for testing convergence is reformulated as a dynamic panel data model, ...
Stacking the Deck: Bureaucratic Missions and Policy Design
Empirical studies suggest that mission-oriented bureaucrats bias their design of program alternatives to increase the odds that a superior will choose the kind of program the of...
Linear Regression Limit Theory for Nonstationary Panel Data
This paper develops a regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data with large numbers of cross section (n) and time series (T) observations. The limit theory allows for ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1990
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 714-735
- Citations
- 506
- Access
- Closed