Abstract

This paper tests the rationality of individual price forecasts in a panel of professional forecasters. Here, unlike in most previous studies, rationality is not rejected. The results here differ because (1) using individual forecasts avoids aggregation bias, (2) comparison of forecasts to initial data avoids bias due to data revision, (3) the professional forecasters have economic incentives to state their expectations accurately, and (4) a new covariance matrix estimator consistent when forecast errors are correlated across individuals is used. Copyright 1990 by American Economic Association.

Keywords

RationalityEconomicsEconometricsIncentivePanel dataEstimatorCovarianceRational expectationsMicroeconomicsStatisticsMathematics

Related Publications

Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach

A panel data approach is advocated and implemented for studying growth convergence. The familiar equation for testing convergence is reformulated as a dynamic panel data model, ...

1995 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 3461 citations

Publication Info

Year
1990
Type
article
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
714-735
Citations
506
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

506
OpenAlex

Cite This

Michael P. Keane, David E. Runkle (1990). Testing the Rationality of Price Forecasts: New Evidence from Panel Data. American Economic Review , 80 (4) , 714-735.