Tests for Parameter Instability in Regressions with 1(1) Processes

1992 Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 945 citations

Abstract

This article derives the large-sample distributions of Lagrange multiplier (LM) tests for parameter instability against several alternatives of interest in the context of cointegrated regression models. The fully modified estimator of Phillips and Hansen is extended to cover general models with stochastic and deterministic trends. The test statistics considered include the SupF test of Quandt, as well as the LM tests of Nyblom and of Nabeya and Tanaka. It is found that the asymptotic distributions depend on the nature of the regressor processes—that is, if the regressors are stochastic or deterministic trends. The distributions are noticeably different from the distributions when the data are weakly dependent. It is also found that the lack of cointegration is a special case of the alternative hypothesis considered (an unstable intercept), so the tests proposed here may also be viewed as a test of the null of cointegration against the alternative of no cointegration. The tests are applied to three data sets—an aggregate consumption function, a present value model of stock prices and dividends, and the term structure of interest rates.

Keywords

CointegrationEconometricsEstimatorMathematicsContext (archaeology)Asymptotic distributionStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Testing for Common Trends

Abstract Cointegrated multiple time series share at least one common trend. Two tests are developed for the number of common stochastic trends (i.e., for the order of cointegrat...

1988 Journal of the American Statistical A... 1912 citations

Publication Info

Year
1992
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
321-335
Citations
945
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

945
OpenAlex

Cite This

Bruce E. Hansen (1992). Tests for Parameter Instability in Regressions with 1(1) Processes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics , 10 (3) , 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509908

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/07350015.1992.10509908