Abstract
It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs. The motivation to be accurate enhances use of those beliefs and strategies that are considered most appropriate, whereas the motivation to arrive at particular conclusions enhances use of those that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion. There is considerable evidence that people are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at, but their ability to do so is constrained by their ability to construct seemingly reasonable justifications for these conclusions. These ideas can account for a wide variety of research concerned with motivated reasoning.
Keywords
Variety (cybernetics)Construct (python library)Set (abstract data type)Affect (linguistics)CognitionPsychologyCognitive psychologyMotivated reasoningSocial psychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet
During the course of the past year, at least four different academic surveys have been conducted, each focusing to some extent on the impact of Internet use on the quantity and ...
The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology
The clinician looking, listening, or feeling for signs of a disease may far prefer a false alarm to a miss, particularly if the disease is serious and contagious. On the other h...
Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations
This article focuses on memory-based choice situations where changes in a brand's accessibility may affect the probability that it is retrieved and considered for choice. In suc...
Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior.
Drawing from recent developments in social cognition, cognitive psychology, and behavioral decision theory, we analyzed when and how the act of measuring beliefs, attitudes, int...
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
Hypothesis I: There exists, in the human organism, a drive to evaluate his opinions and his abilities. While opinions and abilities may, at first glance, seem to be quite differ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1990
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-498
- Citations
- 7851
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
7851
OpenAlex
Cite This
Ziva Kunda
(1990).
The case for motivated reasoning..
Psychological Bulletin
, 108
(3)
, 480-498.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480