Abstract
Bayesian statistical practice makes extensive use of versions of objective Bayesian\nanalysis. We discuss why this is so, and address some of the criticisms that have been\nraised concerning objective Bayesian analysis. The dangers of treating the issue too\ncasually are also considered. In particular, we suggest that the statistical community\nshould accept formal objective Bayesian techniques with confidence, but should be more\ncautious about casual objective Bayesian techniques.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models
Mixed-effect models are frequently used to control for the nonindependence of data points, for example, when repeated measures from the same individuals are available. The aim o...
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
Abstract We outline a framework for causal inference in settings where assignment to a binary treatment is ignorable, but compliance with the assignment is not perfect so that t...
On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics
A new approach to problems of multiple significance testing was presented in Benjamini and Hochberg (1995), which calls for controlling the expected ratio of the number of erron...
CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC
[1st paragraph] At first sight, Bayesian inference with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) appears to be straightforward. The user defines a full probability model, perhaps using o...
Density Ratios, Empirical Likelihood and Cot Death
SUMMARY A method is developed for the estimation of the logarithm of the ratio of two probability density functions. The method has applications in several contexts, notably in ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2006
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Citations
- 733
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1214/06-ba115