Abstract
“Interdependence” has long been a cardinal element in theoretical analyses of international politics, but its utility has been hampered by disagreements over both the meaning of the term and its links to changes in state behavior. This article provides a general framework for resolving those debates by using a game-theoretic analysis developed by Kelley and Thibaut. Their work demonstrates that past calls for choosing between the concepts of vulnerability and sensitivity are misplaced. The first measures dependence, the second interdependence. Only by using both—and by combining them with a third measure, independence—can we fully model the interactions of states in international politics. With such a complete model we can then begin to understand why some seemingly baneful issues in international politics (such as Mutual Assured Destruction) can still lead to cooperative outcomes, while some apparently benign issues (such as free trade) often lead to conflict. Finally, the article offers some preliminary propositions on the connection between interdependence and cooperation, tying those propositions to the measures of interdependence developed by earlier analysts.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations
Students of world politics have tended to assume that states act as units. Yet trans-governmental relations—direct interactions among sub-units not controlled or closely guided ...
“Homogeneity” and Constitutional Democracy: Coping with Identity Conflicts through Group Rights
In this article I explore some ancient issues of political theory in the light of some contemporary social and cultural issues. After developing a check list of the virtues and ...
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
How decision makers define state interests and formulate policies to deal with complex and technical issues can be a function of the manner in which the issues are represented b...
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
Free-market worldviews are an important predictor of the rejection of scientific findings that have potential regulatory implications, such as climate science, but not necessari...
Theories of international regimes
Over the last decade, international regimes have become a major focus of empirical research and theoretical debate within international relations. This article provides a critic...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1993
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-321
- Citations
- 36
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/2600811