Abstract
Most empirical studies of the static CAPM assume that betas remain constant over time and that the return on the value-weighted portfolio of all stocks is a proxy for the return on aggregate wealth. The general consensus is that the static CAPM is unable to explain satisfactorily the cross-section of average returns on stocks. We assume that the CAPM holds in a conditional sense, i.e., betas and the market risk premium vary over time. We include the return on human capital when measuring the return on aggregate wealth. Our specification performs well in explaining the cross-section of average returns.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying Covariances
The capital asset pricing model provides a theoretical structure for the pricing of assets with uncertain returns. The premium to induc e risk-averse investors to bear risk is p...
Another Look at the Cross‐section of Expected Stock Returns
ABSTRACT Our examination of the cross‐section of expected returns reveals economically and statistically significant compensation (about 6 to 9 percent per annum) for beta risk ...
SECURITY PRICES, RISK, AND MAXIMAL GAINS FROM DIVERSIFICATION*
Sections II and III of this paper set forth the simple logic which leads directly to the determination of explicit equilibrium prices of risk assets traded in competitive market...
Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns
This study investigates whether marketwide liquidity is a state variable important for asset pricing. We find that expected stock returns are related cross-sectionally to the se...
Further Evidence On Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality
ABSTRACT In a previous paper, we found systematic price reversals for stocks that experience extreme long‐term gains or losses: Past losers significantly outperform past winners...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- article
- Citations
- 466
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.21034/sr.208