Abstract
ABSTRACT Using a database that is free of survivorship bias, this article finds that book‐to‐market equity, earnings yield, and cash flow yield have significant explanatory power with respect to the cross‐section of realized stock returns during the period from July 1940 through June 1963. There is a strong January seasonal in the explanatory power of these variables, even though small stocks are, by construction, excluded from the sample.
Keywords
Related Publications
Book-To-Market across Firm Size, Exchange, and Seasonality: Is There an Effect?
Fama and French (1992) report that size and the book-to-market ratio capture the cross-sectional variation of average stock returns for the universe of NYSE, Amex, and Nasdaq se...
Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan
ABSTRACT This paper relates cross‐sectional differences in returns on Japanese stocks to the underlying behavior of four variables: earnings yield, size, book to market ratio, a...
Dissecting Anomalies
ABSTRACT The anomalous returns associated with net stock issues, accruals, and momentum are pervasive; they show up in all size groups (micro, small, and big) in cross‐section r...
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
ABSTRACT Two easily measured variables, size and book‐to‐market equity, combine to capture the cross‐sectional variation in average stock returns associated with market β , size...
THE INCREMENTAL INFORMATION CONTENT OF ACCRUAL VERSUS CASH FLOWS
Current financial reporting practices have traditionally emphasized measures of accrual earnings. On the other hand, the link between future cash flows and firm value is well ac...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1994
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1579-1593
- Citations
- 390
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04773.x