Abstract

After 4 decades of severe criticism, the ritual of null hypothesis significance testing (mechanical dichotomous decisions around a sacred .05 criterion) still persists. This article reviews the problems with this practice, including near universal misinterpretation of p as the probability that H₀ is false, the misinterpretation that its complement is the probability of successful replication, and the mistaken assumption that if one rejects H₀ one thereby affirms the theory that led to the test. Exploratory data analysis and the use of graphic methods, a steady improvement in and a movement toward standardization in measurement, an emphasis on estimating effect sizes using confidence intervals, and the informed use of available statistical methods are suggested. For generalization, psychologists must finally rely, as has been done in all the older sciences, on replication. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Keywords

Earth (classical element)PsychologyPolitical scienceMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1994
Type
article
Volume
49
Issue
12
Pages
997-1003
Citations
3858
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3858
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jacob Cohen (1994). The earth is round (p < .05).. American Psychologist , 49 (12) , 997-1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997